A Complete Contemporary History of the Cock Lane Ghost, 1762
Analyst rating: mixed
“and thirty times. . The report current in the}: 'To be Let, and ‘entered’ upon immediately,”
Known gaps: No known completeness gaps recorded.
Private Skeptical Evidence Corpus
Legacy category: Hauntings and Poltergeists
"The reported claim remains worth testing against the record: Knocks attributed to a ghost were reported in a Cock Lane house and became the subject of public tests, pamphlets, and satire in 1762. The strongest documented reasons to keep the file open are: A Complete Contemporary History of the Cock Lane Ghost, 1762: Collects contemporary reporting and descriptions of the public controversy; Goldsmith, The Mystery Revealed, 1762: Presents transactions and testimonials aimed at resolving the claim. Key unresolved lead: A single neutral transcript of every examination"
"Evidentiary limitations: Moderate as documentation of a historical report wave; low as proof of a paranormal or unknown-animal cause. Note that: A Complete Contemporary History of the Cock Lane Ghost, 1762 fails to support: Its compilation choices and polemical context require corroboration; Goldsmith, The Mystery Revealed, 1762 fails to support: It is an argumentative publication, not a neutral court transcript. Documented contradiction: Believing and skeptical pamphlets interpret the same performances differently. Leading conventional hypothesis: A child-produced knocking fraud reinforced by expectation"
Three 1762 publications preserve the contemporary claim, its investigation, and immediate skeptical cultural response. The case is unusually auditable for an early haunting because the record includes public testing and a fraud finding, though the pamphlets remain partisan.
3 inspectable evidence items. Claims and source findings are kept separate.
Analyst rating: mixed
“and thirty times. . The report current in the}: 'To be Let, and ‘entered’ upon immediately,”
Analyst rating: challenges
“Jady, deceived by an acute pain in the back, =”
Analyst rating: challenges
“Where more is meant than meets the ear.”
| Hypothesis | Stance | Rationale | Evidence IDs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deliberate fraud by the Parsons household | Mixed | The staged sources are compatible with this hypothesis but do not test it uniquely. | e1, e2, e3 |
| Misinterpretation during public tests | Mixed | The staged sources are compatible with this hypothesis but do not test it uniquely. | e1, e2, e3 |
| Unresolved anomalous knocking | Inconclusive | The staged sources are compatible with this hypothesis but do not test it uniquely. | e1, e2, e3 |
External URL: https://archive.org/details/b30416437
External URL: https://archive.org/details/bim_eighteenth-century_the-mystery-revealed-co_goldsmith-oliver_1762
External URL: https://archive.org/details/footeorators