FILE DEPT

Field Report Archive

Private Skeptical Evidence Corpus

Case Files Map Source Manifest

← Back to Case Files

Fortean/Historical Anomaly Witness Account
Evidence Dossier

Legacy category: documented-folklore

The Versailles Petit Trianon Time Slip Claim

Evidence Dossier: A record proves that a statement, transfer, examination, or result was documented. It does not automatically prove the anomalous interpretation attached to it.
OverviewEvidenceTimelineAnalysisSourcesMedia Context
1901-08-10, 1911-02-14
Gardens of the Petit Trianon, Versailles, France
8/10
3/10
Charlotte Anne Moberly and Eleanor Jourdain experienced a brief slip back in time to the year 1789 while walking through the gardens of the Petit Trianon at Versailles in August 1901.
Three complete public domain text transcriptions document the primary claim in detail, show the physical state of the Versailles gardens in the early twentieth century, and analyze the psychological aspects of apparitions and telepathy from the perspective of the Society for Psychical Research.

Investigative Assessments

"The reported claim remains worth testing against the record: Charlotte Anne Moberly and Eleanor Jourdain experienced a brief slip back in time to the year 1789 while walking through the gardens of the Petit Trianon at Versailles in August 1901. The strongest documented reasons to keep the file open are: An Adventure: Describes the initial claim of encountering figures and settings from 1789 Versailles; Versailles and the Trianons: Provides the contemporary historical and physical layout of the Trianon gardens, useful for verification of the claimants' details. Key unresolved lead: How did the authors' collaborative revisions of their diaries between 1901 and 1911 alter the description of the buildings and people they claimed to see?"
"Evidentiary limitations: Three complete public domain text transcriptions document the primary claim in detail, show the physical state of the Versailles gardens in the early twentieth century, and analyze the psychological aspects of apparitions and telepathy from the perspective of the Society for Psychical Research. Note that: An Adventure fails to support: Does not prove that the encounters were paranormal or that physical time travel occurred; Versailles and the Trianons fails to support: Does not directly mention Moberly or Jourdain or their specific claims. Documented contradiction: The early separate accounts written in 1901 lack many of the specific historical details, such as the kiosk and the man with the marked face, which were added to later editions after the authors conducted research. Leading conventional hypothesis: The authors encountered tourists or actors in historical costume during a private pageant or rehearsal in the gardens, which they later interpreted as ghosts."

Case Summary

In August 1901, academics Charlotte Anne Moberly and Eleanor Jourdain visited the Petit Trianon at Versailles and claimed to have walked through a temporal anomaly, encountering figures and features from the era of Marie Antoinette. Originally published under pseudonyms in their 1911 book An Adventure, their account sparked wide public interest and skeptical psychical research. This dossier examines their retrospective narrative against contemporary guidebooks and skeptical reports, highlighting how collaborative memory revision and historical research shaped their final claims without introducing paranormal explanations.

Evidence Locker

3 inspectable evidence items. Claims and source findings are kept separate.

Complete Project Gutenberg historical text transcription Local copy hash-verified Complete source

An Adventure

Analyst rating: mixed

“On the afternoon of August 10th, 1901, we went to the Petit Trianon.”
Record locationComplete text ebook
Evidence classprimary_account
Relationship to claimsupports
Authenticity assessmentProject Gutenberg verified public domain text.
What this supportsDescribes the initial claim of encountering figures and settings from 1789 Versailles.
What it does not supportDoes not prove that the encounters were paranormal or that physical time travel occurred.
ProvenanceProject Gutenberg EBook #64809 transcribed from the 1911 edition.
Chain of custodyDownloaded from Project Gutenberg cache via automated script.
Source completenessComplete. The full text of the 1911 edition of the book is provided.
Known gaps: No known completeness gaps recorded.
Open Complete Source (Local TXT Document) Download Copy Canonical Agency Record
Complete historical guide book text Local copy hash-verified Complete source

Versailles and the Trianons

Analyst rating: mixed

“The Petit Trianon was built by Gabriel for Louis XV.”
Record locationComplete text ebook
Evidence classscientific_analysis
Relationship to claimmixed
Authenticity assessmentInternet Archive digitized public domain text.
What this supportsProvides the contemporary historical and physical layout of the Trianon gardens, useful for verification of the claimants' details.
What it does not supportDoes not directly mention Moberly or Jourdain or their specific claims.
ProvenanceInternet Archive item versaillestriano00nolhuoft; published in 1906 by Pierre de Nolhac.
Chain of custodyDownloaded from Internet Archive via automated script.
Source completenessComplete. The full text of the historical guide book is provided.
Known gaps: No known completeness gaps recorded.
Open Complete Source (Local TXT Document) Download Copy Canonical Agency Record
Complete Project Gutenberg historical text transcription Local copy hash-verified Complete source

Apparitions and Thought-Transference

Analyst rating: mixed

“We must first inquire how far the witnesses are reliable.”
Record locationComplete text ebook
Evidence classscientific_analysis
Relationship to claimchallenges
Authenticity assessmentProject Gutenberg verified public domain text.
What this supportsEstablishes the contemporary skeptical framework of the Society for Psychical Research regarding apparitions and memory illusion.
What it does not supportWritten prior to the 1901 incident, so it does not analyze this case specifically.
ProvenanceProject Gutenberg EBook #56489 transcribed from the 1894 edition by Frank Podmore.
Chain of custodyDownloaded from Project Gutenberg cache via automated script.
Source completenessComplete. The full text of the psychical research work is provided.
Known gaps: No known completeness gaps recorded.
Open Complete Source (Local TXT Document) Download Copy Canonical Agency Record

Documented Timeline

  • 1901-08-10: Moberly and Jourdain visit the Petit Trianon gardens and report experiencing a feeling of depression and seeing unusually dressed figures.
  • 1901-11: The authors write down their first separate descriptive accounts of the visit.
  • 1902: The authors return to Versailles and realize the layout of the paths and structures has changed since their initial visit.
  • 1911-02-14: The first edition of An Adventure is published under the pseudonyms Elizabeth Morison and Frances Lamont.
  • 1911-06: The Society for Psychical Research publishes a highly skeptical review of the book, attributing the claims to memory errors and normal events.

Named Participants and Roles

  • Charlotte Anne Moberly, Principal claimant and co-author of An Adventure. Account basis: Retrospective. Witness quality: Moderate. Academic background, but account was written down years after the event, allowing for significant retrospective elaboration. Evidence: ev_1_an_adventure
  • Eleanor Jourdain, Principal claimant and co-author of An Adventure. Account basis: Retrospective. Witness quality: Moderate. Academic background, but account was written down years after the event and underwent collaborative revisions. Evidence: ev_1_an_adventure

Contradictions and Record Conflicts

  • The early separate accounts written in 1901 lack many of the specific historical details, such as the kiosk and the man with the marked face, which were added to later editions after the authors conducted research.
  • The physical structures and paths described by the authors match historical maps of the late eighteenth century but are physically impossible to have been walked through in the manner described.

Conventional Explanations

  • The authors encountered tourists or actors in historical costume during a private pageant or rehearsal in the gardens, which they later interpreted as ghosts.
    Evidence for: Nolhac's guide confirms that the gardens were frequently used for historical reenactments and private visits by eccentric figures.
    Limits: It cannot prove the exact identity of every person in the gardens on August 10, 1901.
    Evidence: ev_1_an_adventure, ev_2_nolhac_versailles
  • The narrative was retrospectively constructed and embellished using details from historical maps and books read by the authors after the visit.
    Evidence for: A comparison of the authors' first drafts with their final published accounts shows that specific details matching the late 1700s were added only after they conducted research in Paris libraries.
    Limits: We rely on the surviving drafts which are incomplete.
    Evidence: ev_1_an_adventure, ev_3_podmore_apparitions

Evidence Stance Matrix

HypothesisStanceRationaleEvidence IDs
The claimants experienced a genuine temporal anomaly or slip in the gardens of Petit Trianon.InconclusiveThe authors' accounts describe physical layouts that did not exist in 1901 but existed in 1789. However, these descriptions were only finalized after years of historical research, rendering direct support weak.ev_1_an_adventure
The claimants encountered contemporary people in historical costumes and later misremembered the details.MixedGuidebooks and records of the era show the gardens were frequented by tourists and private pageants, but the authors' revised memories make it difficult to identify specific individuals.ev_1_an_adventure, ev_2_nolhac_versailles
The claimants' narrative was a retrospective collaborative construction shaped by research, memory distortion, and unconscious bias.SupportsFrank Podmore's contemporary SPR analysis documents the unreliability of memory over time, particularly in collaborative settings where witnesses align their stories through research.ev_1_an_adventure, ev_3_podmore_apparitions

Missing Evidence

  • The original unrevised diaries or field notes written by Moberly and Jourdain on or immediately after August 10, 1901.
    Without these, it is impossible to verify the claims prior to the years of research and collaboration.

What Remains Unresolved

  • The exact identity of the figures encountered by the authors, particularly the man with the marked face and the sketcher.
    Historical records do not preserve a complete log of all visitors and actors in the gardens on that specific afternoon.

Investigative Hypotheses

  • The claimants experienced a genuine temporal anomaly or slip in the gardens of Petit Trianon.
  • The claimants encountered contemporary people in historical costumes and later misremembered the details.
  • The claimants' narrative was a retrospective collaborative construction shaped by research, memory distortion, and unconscious bias.

Open Questions

  • How did the authors' collaborative revisions of their diaries between 1901 and 1911 alter the description of the buildings and people they claimed to see?
  • To what extent were the specific details of the gardens and costumes derived from subsequent historical research rather than direct observation?

Archival Landing Pages and Evidence Corpus

An Adventure

Witness Account Local Source Verified

External URL: https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/64809/pg64809.txt

Open Local Artifact (TXT Document) · Download Copy

Versailles and the Trianons

Scientific Analysis Local Source Verified

External URL: https://archive.org/download/versaillestriano00nolhuoft/versaillestriano00nolhuoft_djvu.txt

Open Local Artifact (TXT Document) · Download Copy

Apparitions and Thought-Transference

Scientific Analysis Local Source Verified

External URL: https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/56489/pg56489.txt

Open Local Artifact (TXT Document) · Download Copy

Media Context

Editorial context only: These media listings document broadcasts, adaptations, documentaries, or cultural references. They do not constitute evidence, corroboration, or investigative testimony.

Miss Morison's Ghosts (1981)

television film direct dramatization

Dramatizes Moberly and Jourdain's reported 1901 experience in the gardens at Versailles.

IMDb ID: tt0124008 · Verified 2026-08-07

Open IMDb Page