FILE DEPT

Field Report Archive

Private Skeptical Evidence Corpus

← Back to Case Files

Government Program
Single-Record File

KONA BLUE Proposal

Single-Record File: Only one inspectable record is attached. It documents a source or allegation but cannot independently corroborate the broader claim.
2010s
DHS, USA
9/10
3/10
The US Government hid UAP technologies, extraterrestrial craft, and biological samples which KONA BLUE sought to oversee.
Strong evidence that the program was proposed and rejected, and that no such materials were ever collected.

Investigative Assessments

"The reported claim remains worth testing against the record: The US Government hid UAP technologies, extraterrestrial craft, and biological samples which KONA BLUE sought to oversee. The strongest documented reasons to keep the file open are: AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1: Documents that KONA BLUE was rejected by DHS and no extraterrestrial materials were collected.."
"Evidentiary limitations: Strong evidence that the program was proposed and rejected, and that no such materials were ever collected. Note that: AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1 fails to support: Does not support the existence of hidden USG extraterrestrial craft or bodies.. Documented contradiction: Advocates assumed material existed, but none was ever collected or transferred."

Case Summary

KONA BLUE was a proposed Special Access Program pitched to DHS by advocates convinced the USG was hiding UAP technologies, aiming to transfer allegedly hidden aerospace technology and biological samples to DHS. The proposal was rejected by DHS leadership for lacking merit. No data, craft, or bodies were ever collected or transferred. This pilot synopsis is an intake summary requiring source-by-source verification.

Evidence Locker

1 inspectable evidence item. Claims and source findings are kept separate.

Official report Local copy hash-verified

AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1

Analyst rating: Strong historical record

“It is critical to note that no extraterrestrial craft or bodies were ever collected - this material was only assumed to exist by KONA BLUE advocates and its anticipated contract performers.”
Record locationPage 1
Evidence classHistorical documentation
Relationship to claimRebuts the claim of recovered materials.
Authenticity assessmentOfficial historical review
What this supportsDocuments that KONA BLUE was rejected by DHS and no extraterrestrial materials were collected.
What it does not supportDoes not support the existence of hidden USG extraterrestrial craft or bodies.
ProvenanceExtracted from NARA official corpus release.
Chain of custodyNARA release -> Local hash verified.

Documented Timeline

Not documented: No source-verified chronology has been assembled.

Named Participants and Roles

Not documented: Named participants and roles have not been source-verified.

Contradictions and Record Conflicts

  • Advocates assumed material existed, but none was ever collected or transferred.

Conventional Explanations

Not documented: Conventional explanations have not been evaluated against evidence.

Missing Evidence

Not documented: The evidence gap itself has not yet been fully inventory.

What Remains Unresolved

Not documented: No source-level unresolved findings have been established.

Investigative Hypotheses

  • The USG possesses extraterrestrial material
  • Advocates made an assumption that such material existed without evidence

Open Questions