AARO GoFast Case Resolution Report
Analyst rating: Strong official record of AARO’s event-specific reconstruction and stated uncertainty
“AARO has high confidence that the UAP did not exhibit anomalous or even exceptional behavior.”
Private Skeptical Evidence Corpus
Legacy category: UAP
"The reported claim remains worth testing against the record: A Navy infrared video captured an unidentified object traveling at extraordinary speed just above the ocean. The strongest documented reasons to keep the file open are: AARO GoFast Case Resolution Report: AARO assessed the target at about 13,000 feet and modeled a wind-compensated speed range of about 5 to 92 mph, with high confidence that it showed no anomalous performance; AARO Open-Hearing GoFast Slide: The slide states that the target was assessed at about 13,000 feet and about 45 mph, while winds at that altitude were about 60 knots. Key unresolved lead: What was the recorded object?"
"Evidentiary limitations: Strong for the existence and official provenance of the video and for AARO’s published calculations; limited for exact speed, heading, position, and object identity because the analysis lacked complete aircraft track and atmospheric data. Note that: AARO GoFast Case Resolution Report fails to support: The report does not identify the object and warns that incomplete track and atmospheric data prevent an exact position, heading, or speed solution; AARO Open-Hearing GoFast Slide fails to support: A summary slide does not expose the full computational model, and its statement that DoD released the video in 2017 conflicts with the 2020 date in the detailed report. Documented contradiction: The target appeared to be moving rapidly near the ocean surface, but AARO calculated an altitude of about 13,000 feet. Leading conventional hypothesis: Parallax amplified apparent motion as the fast aircraft viewed a distant target against the surface."
A source-level review of the Navy GoFast video and AARO’s later computational analysis. The object is real as a recorded sensor target, but the available records do not establish exceptional speed, low-altitude flight, or extraterrestrial origin. AARO could not identify the object and assessed with high confidence that it showed no anomalous performance.
4 inspectable evidence items. Claims and source findings are kept separate.
Analyst rating: Strong official record of AARO’s event-specific reconstruction and stated uncertainty
“AARO has high confidence that the UAP did not exhibit anomalous or even exceptional behavior.”
Analyst rating: Independent official presentation of AARO’s conclusion and headline calculation
“AARO, in coordination with S&T partners, assesses with high confidence the UAP did not demonstrate any anomalous speeds or flight characteristics.”
Analyst rating: Strong for the general optical mechanism, but not an independent reconstruction of GoFast
“Because of parallax, stationary objects can appear to have motion, and slow-moving objects can appear to move very fast.”
Analyst rating: Primary sensor video recording of the encounter showing the target and tracking telemetry
“[IR sensor display tracking target in black-hot and white-hot modes showing high apparent speed relative to ocean background]”
External URL: https://catalog.archives.gov/id/493468580
External URL: https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/UAP-Case-Resolution-Reports/
External URL: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Go_Fast_Official_USG_Footage_of_UAP_for_Public_Release.webm